<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is 2009 a Year of Change for Travel SEM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adventuresinsearch.com/travel-industry/is-2009-a-year-of-change-for-travel-sem-00138/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adventuresinsearch.com/travel-industry/is-2009-a-year-of-change-for-travel-sem-00138/</link>
	<description>Because it's a Seriously Adventurous Industry. SEO &#38; Online Marketing Advice for Active Travel &#38; Lifestyle Brands.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:08:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.adventuresinsearch.com/travel-industry/is-2009-a-year-of-change-for-travel-sem-00138/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adventuresinsearch.com/?p=138#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Great article here and at SEW Elisabeth!

I think (and HOPE) 2009 will be the year of change.  Until now - traffic and rankings have been predominantly the &quot;measure of success&quot; for travel SEM companies.  Our clients judge success on &quot;how many visitors&quot; vs. &quot;how many conversions.&quot;  I think 2009 is going to help us change that.

The struggle, as I see it, lies in convincing hotel/resort/property management firms that the real work starts AFTER the traffic arrives.  Many MANY travel websites offer poor user experience - and non existent calls to action or conversion paths.  There hasn&#039;t been much focus on &quot;fixing&quot; the issues people have with finding lodging &amp; booking it online.  NOW is the time to start having the ROI/conversion conversation with our clients.  Even if the number of shoppers (thereby &quot;traffic&quot;) drops off, increasing their (average .5% to 2%) conversion rate by conservative increments can alleviate the pain of a decrease in shoppers all together.  

So Yes, I&#039;m happy to see this change coming about.  Post click marketing and conversion optimization are two of my favorite topics and I hope I&#039;ll get to talk about them A LOT more in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article here and at SEW Elisabeth!</p>
<p>I think (and HOPE) 2009 will be the year of change.  Until now &#8211; traffic and rankings have been predominantly the &#8220;measure of success&#8221; for travel SEM companies.  Our clients judge success on &#8220;how many visitors&#8221; vs. &#8220;how many conversions.&#8221;  I think 2009 is going to help us change that.</p>
<p>The struggle, as I see it, lies in convincing hotel/resort/property management firms that the real work starts AFTER the traffic arrives.  Many MANY travel websites offer poor user experience &#8211; and non existent calls to action or conversion paths.  There hasn&#8217;t been much focus on &#8220;fixing&#8221; the issues people have with finding lodging &amp; booking it online.  NOW is the time to start having the ROI/conversion conversation with our clients.  Even if the number of shoppers (thereby &#8220;traffic&#8221;) drops off, increasing their (average .5% to 2%) conversion rate by conservative increments can alleviate the pain of a decrease in shoppers all together.  </p>
<p>So Yes, I&#8217;m happy to see this change coming about.  Post click marketing and conversion optimization are two of my favorite topics and I hope I&#8217;ll get to talk about them A LOT more in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
